|
19 October 2007
This very well researched paper takes a look at the public health trends in 2007 and their possible links to EMR
exposure. The paper has a strong focus on Australia and is well
referenced. The paper makes reference to many studies that have
demonstrated strong links between electromagnetic radiation exposure and adverse health effects. Cancer clusters and phone masts are discussed in some detail.
An overview of public health trends in 2007
To what extent do these trends reflect the research into adverse
effects on health of Electromagnetic Radiation? A Discussion Paper
Sarah Benson
Introduction
Whilst the increase in certain illnesses has been steady for about four
decades – most figures are indicating that for the last 15 years we
have seen, worldwide, a marked increase in illnesses such as cancers,
cardiac illness, obesity, diabetes, asthma, allergies in children,
short term memory problems and sleeplessness, to name but a few.
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare announced in 2007
that the five leading causes of non-fatal illness in Australia were
diabetes, ischemic heart disease, dementia, asthma, anxiety and
depression. As 90% diabetes is related to weight gain this could be
included as a sixth.
Billions of dollars per year go towards ‘keep fit’ campaigns and research into cures - but we need to start addressing causes.
Factors such as population growth and the ageing population need to be
considered, as do environmental chemicals, food additives and hormones.
However there would need to be something new for such a marked spike to
occur.
There is, in fact, only one significant new factor: the sudden explosion in wireless communications technology, which began in Australia approximately 15 years ago - earlier in the US.
For decades now, the medical fraternity has been greatly concerned
by the huge incidence of literally un-explained cancers in our
population and the finger is pointing to electromagnetic radiation
(EMR) as the likely culprit - or at least a major contributor. Radio
and TV have been broadcasting in the radiofrequency range since the
1950s, but microwave radiation as emitted by communications
infrastructure is relatively new, with millions of antennas and
satellites irradiating the global population 24 hours a day, 52 weeks a
year since the early 90s.
This is not new: electromagnetic fields
(wiring, appliances) and electromagnetic radiation have been a fact of
life for many decades now – it is only in recent times however that the
load has increased to a point where the effects on human health are
becoming a major issue.
Most people don’t think about this fact, they somehow think that
these frequencies that are being sent all around the planet, somehow
magically find their way to our phones, TVs and radios without even
touching us. But the human body has its own delicate and sensitive
electrical system, which is easily affected by the many electromagnetic
frequencies we are surrounded by and which penetrate our bodies daily.
This report aims to show the correlation between current health trends
and the research into adverse health effects of W1EMR. Whilst not all
research shows the same results – it is worth noting that the numerous
positive studies appear to be reflected in the steep rise in certain
health problems. Additionally it largely addresses the health issues as
listed as they relate to the research into RF/MW rather than
electromagnetic fields as they relate to powerlines, substations and
domestic wiring.. However it is worth noting that these fields also
have been shown to produce similar conditions.
A group of scientists and doctors in Freiburger, Germany, presented
evidence at a conference in 2002 of “a dramatic rise in severe and
chronic diseases among our patients” exposed to RF/MW. These included
extreme fluctuations in blood pressure, heart attacks and strokes in
increasingly younger people, degenerative brain diseases such as
Alzheimer’s and epilepsy, leukaemia and brain tumours. They also found
a rise in headaches, sleeplessness, tinnitus and other ailments that
were able to be correlated with the onset of exposure to communications
microwaves.
Communications frequencies use so-called non-thermal levels of
radiation – i.e. they do not directly heat living tissue in the same
way a microwave oven does. Well-known scientist and author Robert
Becker said in 1985, “…when non-thermal dangers were originally
documented in America, military and industrial spokespeople refused to
acknowledge them, lying to Congress and the public. Many scientists who
naturally wanted to continue working went along with the charade.”
"I have no doubt in my mind that, at the present time, the
greatest polluting element in the earth's environment is the
proliferation of electromagnetic fields."
Dr Robert O. Becker, Nobel Prize winner1
Dr. G. J. Hyland of theUniversity of Warwick, UK, calls the human
body “an electrochemical instrument of exquisite sensitivity,” noting
that, like a radio, it can be interfered with by incoming radiation.
Therefore it is misguided to think that electromagnetic radiation would
not be having a negative effect on public health, and there is plenty
of scientific research to show that this is the case. One scientist in
particular led the charge a decade ago, trying to warn us of the
dangers.
As far back as 1994 Australia’s CSIRO did a 150 page literature review
on the status of health effects from EMR. The report’s author, Dr Stan
Barnett, said: “whilst researching the scientific database in
preparation for this report it has become evident that subtle changes
in cell structure and biochemistry have been frequently reported at
exposure levels where gross thermal change could not be attributed as a
cause.”2
From 1996 until he died in 2003, New Zealand physicist and
electromagnetic radiation (EMR) meta-analyst, Dr Neil Cherry, studied
over 600 researchers worldwide. He found that EMR caused DNA breakages,
chromosome aberrations, increased oncogene activity in cells, altered
brain activity, altered blood pressure and increased brain cancer at
very low levels – much lower than those allowed by the Australian
standard. He also found that it impacts on the pineal gland in the
brain, resulting in a reduction of melatonin - a vital part of many of
the body’s biochemical systems, including the mediation of many hormone
functions (including the control of weight) and a
major scavenger of damaging free radicals."3
These findings - in direct conflict with the interests of the
multi-billion dollar telecommunications industry - have not only been
replicated many times since, but have proved to be prophetic: cancer,
leukaemia, cardiac disease, diabetes, sleep disturbances, dementia,
weight gain or loss, weakened immune system, asthma, allergies,
arthritis, nausea, memory and concentration problems, neurological
conditions, and depression to name but a few – all on a sharp rise.
He was surprised to find how much published research there is to show
that - across the entire EMR spectrum - damage"2 was done to cellular
DNA, rendering it genotoxic and therefore likely to be implicated in
the formation of tumours and other illnesses.
Since then other scientists have turned up further studies showing
similar results. A study published in August 2007 indicates that mobile
phone radiation causes cancer in mice"4 , and another one - published
in August 2007 in New Scientist by scientists at the Weizmann Institute
of Science in Israel - finds that after only 5 minutes of exposure to
radiation one tenth of the power of a mobile phone, rat and human cell
chemicals undergo changes.
Marshall and Wetherall found an exponential increase in the USA of
autism, ADHD, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and Alzheimer's since 1984, the
year the first commercial cell phone networks started to spread across
the USA. These rates increased even further with the switchover from
analog (1G) to digital (2G) in the early 1990s."5
In 2005 researchers in China found that relatively low-level RF
radiation can lead to DNA breaks6, and in 2004 the REFLEX project,
which summarised the work of 12 research groups in seven European
countries, reported that RF radiation could increase the number of DNA
breaks in exposed cells, as well as activate a stress response – the
production of heat-shock proteins. The manager of the project, Franz
Adlkofer, said: “…available scientific evidence of such critical events
demonstrates the need for intensifying research – precautionary
measures seem to be warranted.”7
Dr Peter French found that mobile phone radiation switched on heat shock proteins:
"In plain English, the point is that it has been demonstrated by
several researchers that increasing the amount of heat shock proteins
in cells results in the increased potential for developing tumours,
increased stimulation of metastasis or spread of cancers, the direct
development of cancer, de novo, and the decreased effectiveness of
anti-cancer drugs." Dr Peter French"8
Cherry also found that microwaves can open the blood brain barrier
allowing damaging chemicals, viruses and bacteria into the brain which
could cause problems such as dementia and brain tumours."9
His findings continue to be verified by many independent scientists and
doctors around the world, many of whom are signatories to large scale
resolutions such as the Benevento Resolution in 2006 and Salzburg
Resolution in 2000, announcing their acknowledgement of a connection
between adverse health effects and exposure to microwave radiation. As
a result, Salzburg has now lowered its exposure levels.
In February 2007 Swedish scientists announced in the European
Journal of Cancer Prevention that they had observed a connection
between the health of the population and population density, suggesting
that the two factors having the strongest correlation with decreased
health quality were the estimated average power output from mobile
phones…and the reported coverage from the global system for mobile
communication base stations in each country.”10
This has been confirmed by German company ECOLOG’s report,
commissioned by telecommunications company T-Mobil in 2000. The results
of this research - leaked to British group HESE in 2006 - have just
been translated into English. It found that cancer, DNA damage,
chromosome aberrations, changes to enzymes, changes in the brain,
interruption of cell cycle and cellular communication, debilitation of
the immune system and changes to the central nervous system.
Around a dozen studies were found in 2006 and 2007 demonstrating
similar results, including one that found the signal from a mobile
phone affecting genes and neurons in both ‘on’ and ‘off’ modes"11 and
another found “some evidence of"3 nervous system structural damage
after the EMR exposure."12
"Is it really wise and safe to subject ourselves to whole-body
irradiation, all around the clock and wherever we are, with the same
mobile radiation which laboratory studies have shown to cause serious
injuries and effects?" Olle Johansson, Ph.D., Neuroscientist, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden"13
The National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) in
America found that 30 per cent of the population are more susceptible
to environmental pollutants than the rest of the population; they can
be seen as the canaries in the mine."14
Diabetes and Obesity
A staggering one billion of the world's population of 6.45 billion
is overweight, warned the World Health Organisation in 2005. And rates
of overweight and obesity are rising dramatically in poorer countries,
not just wealthy nations.
In the US in 1991 no state had obsesity rates above 20 per cent. By
2000 28 states had obesity rates less than 20 per cent, and in 2005
only four states had prevalence rates of less than 20 per cent,
according to data collected by America’s Centre for Diease Control in
2005.
According to a trial by the George Institute for International
Health over six years to 2007, diabetes is emerging as one of the
greatest threats to the health of populations worldwide. More than
600,000 Australians are affected by this condition.
And in Australia, 93,000 West Australian children aged between 5
and 15 are estimated to be overweight or obese, putting them at risk of
not just heart disease as they get older but also the crippling bone
disease arthritis, reported a West Australian Health Department survey
in June 2007.
The Auditor General reported in 2007 that these conditions just keep on
rising. An estimated 90 per cent of new diabetes cases are attributed
to weight gain, which according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics
is now 52 per cent of all Australians. Since the 1980s the amount of
overweight and obese Australian children has more than doubled. It is
estimated that at least 60% of Australians aged 18 years and over will
be overweight or obese by 2010. Diabetes has risen 77 per cent in
Victoria since 2001. The following diagram indicates the sudden rise in
obesity from about 1994.
In July 2007 obesity researchers at the Garvan Institute in Sydney
reported that a pain-killing chemical produced by the brain may be
causing the body to “pile on fat”. Researchers have found that
chemicals in the brain are influenced by EMR.
• Magda Havas, Environmental Science Professor at Trent University
in Canada, found in 2006 that blood sugar levels in diabetes rise and
fall with an electrical environment."14
• Researchers in Japan have been able to induce obesity in rats by
producing microwave-induced lesions to an area of hypothalamus. They
noted a drop in hypothalamic norepinephrine and dopamine and a decrease
in adrenal epinephrine – a potential cause of obesity."15
Scientists have also found that dysfunctional mitochondria will
interfere with the cellular energy production and can be linked to
fatigue - and possibly obesity"16
"Dr Russell Reiter’s book on melatonin lists several illnesses that
result from reduced melatonin. The first is arthritis, then diabetes,
cancer..." Dr Neil Cherry"17.
Cancer
By 2006 there were an estimated 106,000 new cases of cancer diagnosed
in Australia, a 34 per cent increase over the past decade. The
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) says the number of
cancers being diagnosed each year is growing faster than the overall
population."18
In September 2007 David Whiteman, senior research fellow at the
Queensland Institute of Medical Research announced that a rapid rise in
oesophagus cancer is linked to obesity. It’s a real increase in cancer
which you just don’t see in epidemiological lifetimes,” he said. “It’s
unprecedented to see a cancer come up so quickly”.
Mobile phone tower Cancer Clusters
1. In 2002 Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called for an urgent
government probe into the link between mobile phone masts and cancer
after it emerged that people living in five of the seven homes
surrounding Forest House in Carnarvon Road, South Woodford, which has
16 masts on its roof, have contracted cancer."19
The… incidence of leukaemia near the South Woodford mast is far higher
than would be expected normally, according to the statistics. There was
a significant decline in the incidence of all cancers the further
residents lived away from the mast.
2. In April 2007 The Sunday Times reported that seven clusters of
cancer and other serious illnesses have been discovered around mobile
phone towers in the UK, raising concerns over the technology’s
potential impact on health there.
3. In 2003 Telecom giant Orange has suspended operations at a school phone
mast site in Paris after eight cases of cancer were confirmed among children in the district.
4. Near Cardiff in Wales at least eight residents in the parish of
St Georges and St Brides have died of cancer in the past five years. In
every one of the 10 houses on a residential street close to the
Sandy Heath transmitter in Bedfordshire, there has been a cancer death."20
In 2006 17 people around a mobile phone tower in Norfolk County in the
US reported symptoms of microwave sickness – including headaches,
fatigue, nausea and dizziness since the installation of the tower. The
tower is to be removed."21
An industry funded study found in 1997 that of the exposed mice,
43% developed cancer, compared to 22% in the control group.22 This was
regarded by biomedical scientists around the world as highly
significant. “…it may indicate that in individuals genetically
predisposed to certain forms of cancer, the long-term intermittent
exposure to RF such as those used by mobile phones may be an important
stimulus in the induction of malignancy.” Peter French, Principal
Scientific Officer, Centre for Immunology, St Vincent’s Hospital,
Sydney."23
In the UK in 1999, analysis conducted for The Sunday Times by
Professor Gordon Stewart, one of Britain's leading epidemiologists,
shows there may be a significant increase in the risk of cancers,
including leukaemia, associated with mobile phone masts.
The study revealed an increased incidence of cancer within up to 7km of
masts. Subsequent inquiries have unearthed possible clusters in London,
Bedfordshire, south Wales and the Midlands.
People in one area near the mast were found to be 33 per cent more likely to suffer from cancer.
"Public health surveys of people living in the vicinity of cell site
(mobile phone) base stations should be being carried out now, and
continue progressively over the next two decades. This is because
effects such as …cardiac disruption, sleep disturbance, reduced immune
system competence, cancers and leukaemia are probable." Dr Neil Cherry”24
"When you turn on the body's defence mechanism against disease,
which the non-ionising radiation does, and you keep turning it on every
day, you down-regulate it and it no longer turns on."
Prof Ted Litovitz, 199925
Studies of the sites show high incidences of cancer, brain haemorrhages
and high blood pressure within a radius of 400 yards of mobile phone
towers.
One of the studies, in Warwickshire, showed a cluster of 31 cancers
around a single street. A quarter of the 30 staff at a special school
within sight of the 90ft high mast have developed tumours since 2000,
while another quarter have suffered significant health problems.
The tower was pulled down by the mobile phone company after the
presentation of the evidence by local protesters. While rejecting any
links to ill-health, the comapny admitted the decision was “clearly
rare and unusual”.
• A health survey carried out in La Ñora, Murcia, Spain in 2004
around two GSM mobile phone towers showed “statistically significant
positive exposure-response associations between the E-field and
fatigue, irritability, headaches, nausea, loss of appetite, sleeping
disorder, depressive tendency, feeling of discomfort, difficulty in
concentration, loss of memory, visual disorder, dizziness and
cardiovascular problems.”26 According to the Mast Sanity group in the
UK 47 cancer clusters have been reported around schools in Spain.
• A study instigated by the President of the Federal Agency for
Radiation Protection in Germany from 1999 until 2004 found that after
five years operation of the mobile phone tower, the relative risk of
getting cancer had trebled for the residents of the area in the
proximity of the tower compared to the residents outside the area."27
• Two studies carried out in 2004 epidemiological studies around
transmitters in Israel over many years. Their conclusion was a
threefold increase of cancers within a 400 m radius of transmitters,
for breast cancer a tenfold increase was found. As a result, two
lawsuits were filed for 33 people who lived close to phone towers and
consequently contracted cancer and leukaemia in that year. "28
• In 2006 an Egyptian study found that “Inhabitants living near
mobile phone base stations are at risk of developing neuropsychiatric
problems and changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions –
either by facilitation or inhibition”.29
• In France researchers found that people living within 300 m of a base station
suffered from tiredness, headaches, sleep disruption, and within 100 m
irritability, depression, loss of memory, dizziness, and loss of
libido.30
The Nobel Prize winning Irish Doctors Association in 2005 listed 70
research papers showing the dangers from low level microwaves. Dr.
Santini listed 20 similar studies, the EM. Radiation Research Trust
listed 9 studies, Dr. Blackwell listed 6 similar studies in his report,
and finally, four international universities completed the Spanish
Study which verified all of the known illnesses.
Dr John Walker, a doctor from Sutton Coldfield, compiled three
cancer cluster studies around mobile phone towers from Devon,
Lincolnshire, Staffordshire and the West Midlands. He was convinced
they showed a potential link between the angle of the beam of radiation
emitted from the masts’ antennae and illnesses discovered in local
populations."31
Dr Sutton first noticed a high number of specific cancers in the early
1990s. Out of 18 houses in one street eight – ten people were diagnosed
with one form of cancer. He said the odds of three such clusters
occurring were one in a billion."32
The epidemiological figures show that, within 1.4 miles of the
Sutton Coldfiled mast, the number of adult leukaemia cases was nearly
double what would normally be expected.
• A study published in 2007 by Mina Ha of Dankook University in
South Korea found that “children living within 2km of an AM transmitter
had more than twice the risk of developing leukaemia, compared to those
living more than 20km away.” 33
• Communities living near the Vatican radio transmitter north of
Rome have reported high rates of cancer – with twice the usual rate of
childhood leukaemia within sic kilometres of the radio station. The
incidence of both decreased with distance from the antennas."34
• In 2000 Australian Dr Bruce Hocking presented the findings of a
health study in a 4km zone surrounding Sydney TV towers. He found that
children living within a 4km radius of television towers had a 60%
higher incidence of leukaemia than children who lived further from the
towers and there was a far greater risk of dying from the disease. Dr
Hocking also found a slightly increased rate of adult cancer in the
study area than beyond it."35
"…Over 20 studies show that both through reducing melatonin and
through enhancing free radical activity, EMR is genotoxic, damaging the
DNA and chromosomes, enhancing oncogene expression and transforming
cells to neoplastic cells and causing cancer in exposed populations."
Dr Neil Cherry"36
Breast cancer
According to the Australian Bureau of statistics, breast cancer was the
most commonly diagnosed new cancer in women in 2001, with prostate
cancer in men the most common. "37
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Cancer Monitoring
Unit said that the number of women diagnosed with breast cancer has
more than doubled in the past 20 years - increasing from 5,318 women in
1983 to 12,027 women in 2002."38
In America, the Federal Centre for Disease Control in the US has
said that cancer is the leading cause of premature loss of life among
American women - and that breast cancer was the leader in that
category.
According to the Breast Cancer Fund’s “State of the Evidence”
report, approximately half of all breast cancers are caused by
environmental factors, including radiation. "39
This is directly connected to the role of Melatonin in the body, which
has been shown to have anti-cancer properties. For example, adding
melatonin to cancer cells in a laboratory dish will cause them to stop
growing. Placing the same dish in an electromagnetic field
will cause the cells to start growing again. Research has also shown
that night shift work may increase the risk of breast cancer by
lowering melatonin levels. At least three studies suggest a link
between night-shift work and increased risk of breast cancer.
In Brisbane, Queensland, from 1995 until 2006 14 women working
night shift for ABC TV in the same room contracted breast cancer. On
13th July 2007 it was reported that a 15th woman working in the same
room had also been diagnosed with breast cancer.
And also in July 2007 a Sydney hospital announced it was investigating
a possible cancer cluster after five female staff members were
diagnosed with breast cancer within six years. Management at Concord
Hospital, in Sydney's west revealed it launched a preliminary
investigation in May concerning cancer patterns among staff. Five
female workers were diagnosed with the disease between 2001 and 2006.
“These are sufficient to classify a causal relationship between EMR
and breast cancer, with melatonin reduction as the biological
mechanism.” Dr Neil Cherry"40
In 2003 Norwegian researchers reported an increased risk of beast cancer among female telegraph operators exposed to RF/EMF.
Premenopausal women showed an increased risk of
oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours. Premenopausal women appear to be
at higher risk than postmenopausal women.
A drop in melatonin levels has also been connected with increases in breast cancer"41
Another
Norwegian study also showed a 60 percent increase in breast cancer risk
in women of all ages living near high voltage power lines."42
Cleary, S., et al, 1990, Glioma Proliferation Modulated in Vitro by
Isothermal Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure, Radiation Research, Vol.
121, No. 1 (Jan., 1990), pp. 38-45
Male Breast Cancer and Male Breasts
Although breast cancer is rare in men, numerous studies point to a
connection between EMR exposure and male breast cancer. A recent
literature review on male breast cancer also identifies exposure to EMR
as a risk factor."43
In 2001 there cases of male beast cancer showed up in the same
office. A law suit was filed – the attorney arguing that the cnacers
were caused, at least in part, by an electrical vault that was next to
the basement office where the men worked. He said that the odds of this
happening were a trillion to one.
Another very ercent phenomena is the appearance of male breasts. The
Sunday Age reported in July 2007 that breast reduction operations on
men have sky-rocketed, with approximately a 22 per cent rise over the
past 12 months. Whilst hormone residues that get into the waterways are
the first thing the mind goes to - one must remember that these have
been around for a few decades and cannot in this instance be
implicated.
Pollan M, et al, Breast cancer, occupation, and exposure to
electromagnetic fields among Swedish men. Am J Ind Med 2001, 39 (3):
276-85
Demers, et al 1991, Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and
Breast Cancer in Men, American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 134, No. 4:
340-347
Brain cancer
Brain cancer is specifically associated with mobile and cordless phone use rather than towers.
Whilst
this report is focusing on trends for the past 15 years, it is
interesting to note that brain cancer rates were already climbing in
the United States among people under the age of 45 by 1990, according
to a study published in The American Journal of Industrial Medicine."44
These findings are the first to report a statistically significant
increase in new cases of brain tumours among younger people. Dr. Devra
Lee Davis, from the University of Washington noted that other
researchers had implicated electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones
as a possible cause of brain tumours."45
Professor Jillian Birch of Manchester University said in 2001 that
cancers such as brain tumours and leukaemia are on a sharp rise in
children – and that modern living could be to blame. "46
The number of brain tumour cases in the US and Europe has increased by
up to 40% in the past 20 years, according to data released at a medical
conference in Italy in 2003."47
The incidence rate for brain tumours is increasing among people of
all ages, but males between 20 and 40 years old are the most affected,
according to Dr. Alba Brandes, an oncologist at the Azienda-Ospedale in
Padua. "The latest epidemiological studies indicate that white collar
workers--intellectuals and professionals--are among the most affected,"
he said. "The reason is still unknown, though environmental causes such
as cellular phones, computers and exposure to electromagnetic fields
cannot be ruled out".
This year the Swiss Federal Agency for Environment issued a report
that said: “it has to be generally regarded as possible that intensive
long-term use of mobile telephones could to an increased risk of brain
tumours.”48
In Melbourne in 2006 seven people at the Royal Melbourne Institute
of Technology (RMIT) developed brain tumours two floors underneath
transmitting antennas. They had been working there for ten years.
• In January 2007 the International Journal of Cancer published a
study that found a higher incidence of brain tumours on the same side
of the head the phone was used after ten or more years of exposure,"49
and also in 2007 a meta-analysis by Swedish researcher Hardell
published on the Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine website
also found that the long term risk of such tumours was two-and-a-half
times higher than would normally be expected."50
• In 2006 Hardell also found that “for all studied phone types an
increased risk for brain tumours, mainly acoustic neuroma and malignant
brain tumours.”51
• In 2003 another Swedish by Leif Salford found mobile-phone
exposure caused brain damage in lab rats. Researchers found damage to
neurons in rat brains exposed to radiation from mobile phones, saying
radiation from GSM mobile phones, which are prevalent around the world,
was associated with leakage in the blood-brain barrier."52
• In Qatar, a developing country, scientists found a slight rise in brain tumours between 2004 and 2005."53
• In Finland researchers showed that using a mobile phone decreased blood flow in the brain."54
• An Italian study found that mobile phones temporarily excite the neurons in the part of the brain closest to the phone."55
The Interphone project - a multi-national series of epidemiological
studies conducted by Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority -
tested whether using mobile phones increases the risk of various
cancers in the head and neck found that “people who use mobile phones
for more than ten years have nearly 40 per cent chance of developing
brain tumours on the side of the head against which they hold their
phones”.56
The project comprised national studies from 13 different countries,
which were coordinated by the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC), an agency of the World Health Organisation (WHO).
The German team reported a 2.2-fold increase in the incidence of
gliomas amongst those who had used a mobile phone for at least ten
years.57 Teams from Denmark, Sweden and the UK have already reported
their results, which some observers interpret as indicating a long term
risk.
In 2007 officials in Belgium and Germany called for a ban on mobile
phone use by children under 16, due to the ongoing evidence of harm.
Some doctors in Vienna are displaying warning notices in their
surgeries."58
Many researchers have also found that mobile phone users reported
symptoms of burning or a dull ache in temporal, occipital or auricular
areas, headache, concentration problems, discomfort, memory loss,
burning skin, tingling and tightness."59,60, 61
"Over 40 studies [show] that cell phone frequencies [mirror] the
biological and epidemiological studies for EMR over the past four
decades. This includes…increased brain cancer. I predict a significant
increase in brain tumours in younger groups than normal from the use of
mobiles."62
Symptoms of reduced immune system competence, cardiac problems,
especially of the arrhythmic type and cancers, especially brain tumour
and leukaemia are probable.""63
Dr Neil Cherry
Prostate and Testicular Cancer
An Australian Institute for health and Welfare report shows that rates
of prostate cancer have risen 42% in the past five years, pushing up
the number of prostate cancer cases by 50% to an estimated 18,700 in
2006."64
"In 2003 prostate cancer was named by the AIHW as one of the most
common cancers in Australia. There is a large and coherent body of
evidence of biological mechanisms that support the conclusion of a
plausible, logical and causal relationship between EMR exposure and
cancer, cardiac, neurological and reproductive health effects." Dr Neil Cherry"65
And figures from Europe show a dramatic rise in the incidence of prostate cancer from 1993 and then 1999.
Heart Disease, Strokes, High Blood Pressure
Globally, high blood pressure was one of the top three leading
modifiable risk factors of disease in 2005, along with tobacco and
alcohol. New research has now shown that high blood pressure now causes
up to 66% of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart disease and stroke
in the Asia-Pacific Region, according to The George Institute for
International Health."66
Heart disease, heart attacks, heart irregularities, strokes and high blood pressure are all rising sharply.
In Australia, the Baker Heart Research Institute’s Professor Simon
Stewart in June 2007 sent medical staff into shopping centres around
the country to measure the blood pressure of 15,000 Australians. The
preliminary findings were that 42 per cent of Australians now have high
blood pressure - up from 35 per cent in 2000. Full results of the study
are expected later in the year.
In the US, almost a third of all adults suffer from high blood
pressure, a dramatic rise over the past decade. A recent report in the
Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association indicates some
65 million adults were diagnosed with high blood pressure in 2004,
versus 50 million 10 years ago. (New York Times, June 2004).
Also in 2004 a health survey from 1988 to 2000 by the US Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute and published in The Journal of the American
Medical Association said they were struggling to control the growing
rate of childhood obesity in the United States, with children and
adolescents' blood pressure levels climbing sharply.
A survey done by the British Heart Foundation for the UK’s National
Health Service in 2002 claimed the number of people living with heart
failure has risen by 15 per cent."67
A mechanism for this was proposed by Professor Russell Reiter, one
of the world’s leading researchers on melatonin, who summarises its
role as being vital for healthy sleep, reducing cholesterol and blood
pressure, and therefore the incidence of strokes. "68
High blood pressure was also found amongst those living around phone towers in the UK69
"There is a large and coherent body of evidence of biological
mechanisms that support the conclusion of a plausible, logical and
causal relationship between EMR exposure and cancer, cardiac,
neurological and reproductive health effects." Dr Neil Cherry"71
Asthma and Allergies
A report in July 2007 published in the Medical Journal of Australia
claimed that young children are being admitted into hospital with
severe food allergies at five times the rate of a decade ago. The
report’s author, Professor Raymond Mullins who also works as a
practitioner in Canberra, noted a 12-fold increase in childhood
allergies in the last couple of years."72
By 2001 there had been a 25 per cent rise in asthma in Sydney, with an increase in the death rate by 5 per cent.
Another report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare in
2005 found that asthma is the most common chronic disease among
children up to the age of 14."73
The National Jewish Medical and Research Centre in Denver reported
that after re-unification, West Germans were found to be far more
allergic than their eastern counterparts, even though industrial
pollution was so much higher. Many researchers and scientists were -
and still are - puzzled by this fact, but what they failed to examine
is the fact that East Germany had much stricter regulations regarding
ambient radiation levels than West Germany. Since East Germany adopted
West Germany's standards, allergies in former East Germany have since
reached par with the levels of former West Germany.
In 1997 microbiologist Dr Peter French of St Vincent’s Hospital in
Sydney was conducting experiments on mast cells. What he discovered was
that the production of histamine – the chemical responsible for
allergic reactions - and which is involved in bronchial spasm, is
nearly doubled after exposure to mobile phone frequencies. He
speculated that this could result in an increase in illnesses such as
asthma and allergies in the years to come."74
• Low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELFs) have been shown to increase the number of mast cells in the body."75
• Microwaves have also been found to increase immunoglobulin
antibodies in the body which are responsible for triggering an allergic
reaction to a particular substance or protein."76
Dr. John Holt … pointed out that mobile phone frequencies double the amount of histamines and thus cause asthma and allergies.
Alzheimer’s Disease
Someone develops Alzheimer’s every 72 seconds, according to America’s
2007 Alzheimer’s Association report. lzheimer’s Association today
reports that in 2007 there are now more than 5 million people in the
United States living with Alzheimer’s disease, which is a 10 percent
increase from the previous prevalence nationwide estimate of 4.5
million.
15 years ago Alzheimer’s disease was considered a rare condition – what has happened in the interim?
The American Diabetes Association has also warned that today's
mushrooming diabetes epidemic will become tomorrow's Alzheimer's
epidemic in an address to the Association's 67th Annual Scientific
Sessions, held June 2007 in Chicago.
And in the UK, experts from the Alzheimer’s Society have predicted
this year that rising rates of obesity will lead to dramatic increases
in the number of people with Alzheimer's disease. Obesity, smoking,
high blood pressure and cholesterol all increase the risk of dementia
because they can lead to damage of the blood vessels in the brain,
which in turn leads to the death of brain cells."78
In Australia, $1,000,000 per year is spent on Alzheimer’s disease.
Whilst this is also a picture of the ageing population – there is
nevertheless no real reason for this to result in such a high rate of
dementia.
In June 2007 neurologist Sudha Seshadri of Boston University found
that diabetes speeds — and may even cause — Alzheimer's disease. The
central problem in diabetes is the body's inability to regulate blood
sugar through the hormone insulin."79
Exposure to electromagnetic radiation has been shown to effect an
abnormal drop in the levels of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine."80
A drop in the levels of this neurotransmitter has been linked to a
number of neurological and neuromuscular disorders - including
Alzheimer's disease.
Several studies demonstrated the permeability of the blood brain
barrier by Salford and his colleagues"81,82, and in 2003 another study
showed that mobile phones damage key brain cells and could trigger the
early onset of Alzheimer's disease. They found that radiation from
mobile phone handsets damages areas of the brain associated with
learning, memory and movement. “We have good reason to believe that
what happens in rat's brains also happens in humans”, he said."83
"Melatonin plays a vital free radical scavenging role in the brain
where, because it is high in iron, has a high production rate of
hydroxyl radicals (OH·). Free radical damage is now known to play a
formative role in most brain disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease,
Lou Gehrig’s disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease." Dr Neil Cherry.
"EM fields alter the levels of protective proteins…. these
protective proteins are related to Alzheimer’s and that a reduction in
protective proteins means a greater probability of Alzheimer’s. This is
a theory which we have not tested, but there is data out there that
appears to relate the incidence of Alzheimer’s to exposure to
electromagnetic fields." Professor Ted Litovitz
Depression and Anxiety
The number of young people battling depression has doubled in 12 years,
according to a report in 2002 from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation in
the UK.
Mood disorders such as depression and anxiety can be attributed to
a variety of variables such as drug and alcohol abuse, stress and poor
diet. However I mention them in this context as they are also
implicated buy the research into EMR.
It should be noted that a substantial body of research showing this
outcome has been done on the effects of EM fields from powerlines and
other non-radiant sources such as sub-stations, domestic wiring etc
rather than RF/MW.
A report by the US government shows a sudden sharp rise in youth
suicide rate. The year 2003 to 2004 shows a sudden 18 per cent rise for
suicides among the under 20s, from 1,737 to 1,985. The rise is largely
driven by increases in deaths among older teenagers. This apparently is
a sudden reversal in a trend that has shown a steady decline in the 10
years before that.
Depression rates have been growing continuously every year. More
and more people are affected by this disease, and people are finding it
increasingly difficult to cope with certain conditions of life at times.
Microwave exposure has been shown to cause a decrease of 5-HT in the
blood. 5-HT is a precursor to the production of the brain hormone
serotonin. Low levels of serotonin have been linked to anxiety and
depression. An increase in anxiety and depression can in turn be linked
to an increase in the number of suicides."85
Changes in the levels of the brain hormone, dopamine, have been
shown to be connected with microwave radiation and other EMF exposure86
A drop in dopamine levels has also been linked with depression"87
• Dr Cherry found that melatonin reduction, clinical depression and
suicide are all significantly and/or dose response related to EMR
exposure"88. Along with sleep disruption and brain tumour, this
constitutes a very strong and coherent set of data supporting a causal
relationship between ELF to RF/MW exposure, including mobile phone
usage, and neurological illness.
• In 2006 Melbourne University researcher Michael Berk discovered
that the incidence of geomagnetic storms caused by solar flares
influenced the suicide rate, saying that this could possibly indicate
that other sources of electromagnetism could cause depression,
including artificial sources."89
• The 2004 Spanish study around the mobile phone tower in Murcia
found that depressive tendencies were among the symptoms
experienced."90
Sleep disturbance
There are many causes of sleeplessness – but there is little doubt that sleep problems are on the rise
.
In increasingly sophisticated economies in the West could
lead to the creation of "zombie nations", reported the UK Telegraph in
June 2007. Symptoms of deprivation range from weight gain to
irritability, hallucinations and depression, Professor Russell Foster,
of Oxford University, told the Cheltenham Science Festival.
A recent study of 2000 women by Britain’s National Sleep Foundation
found that 70 per cent of the women experienced regular ongoing sleep
problems, with men only 52 per cent.
And in the US in 2006 42 million people (one in five) took medication to help them sleep – up 60 per cent since 2000.
A study conducted around the Schwarzenburg radio and TV tower in
Switzerland in the mid 1990s showed that the local population suffered
from insomnia and other neurological problems such as nervousness,
weakness, tiredness, restlessness and aching limbs,91whilst the tower
was operating, but resumed normal sleeping patterns when it was
switched off. Cherry explained that this was due to reduced melatonin
levels caused by exposure to the signal.
• Hutter et al92 found that people living near mobile phone towers
suffered from headaches, tiredness, sleep disturbance, loss of memory,
dizziness, and difficulty in concentrating.
"... They were sampling melatonin before and after the tower was
permanently turned off and they found a significant rise in melatonin
after the tower was turned off. They found a dose response increase in
sleep disturbance. When the tower was turned off experimentally, the
sleep quality improved and melatonin rose in animals." Dr Neil Cherry"93
• In Oberlaindern in Germany in 2003 a radio tower was closed down due
to complaints from the locals, who complained the signal was keeping
them awake. 94
• In addition, resting EEG patterns have shown a shortening of REM
sleep and a strengthening of alpha waves. In 1996, researchers K. Mann
and J. Röschke in
Neuropsychobiology, pointed out that “REM sleep plays a special physiological role for information processing in the brain” 95
• Recent studies from Spain, France and the UK around the mobile phone
towers in found that sleep problems were among the symptoms
experienced.
Arthritis
More children are suffering from arthritis than ever before.
Unpublished data released in June, 2007 from a study conducted jointly
by the American College of Rheumatology and the American Academy of
Paediatrics at the behest of the Centres for Disease Control and
Prevention states that nearly 300,000 children in the United States
have significant arthritis.
The Bloorview MacMillan Children's Centre in Toronto states that this
number is “probably an underestimate” since it only takes into account
those children who have actually been diagnosed with arthritis.
An Australian study confirms that the rate of childhood arthritis is four to six times higher than rates typically quoted.
Data
released in the Medical Journal of Australia showed that there was a
jump of 46 per cent in arthritis cases from 1990 to 1995.
“There is a clear indication of a dramatic growth in the prevalence of arthritis in people aged 24 and over”. Dr Kenneth Muirden of the Arthritis Foundation of Australia,
As mentioned in the section on obesity, being overweight is putting
people at risk of not just heart disease as they get older but also the
crippling bone disease arthritis.
"Multiple observations of melatonin reduction in EMR-exposed
populations mean that EMR exposure increases the incidence of
arthritis, diabetes, cancer, reproductive, neurological and cardiac
disease and or death, as identified by Reiter and Robinson." Dr Neil Cherry"96
Memory Loss and Concentration
This is a common experience – it hardly needs to be said that we all
experience memory loss, no matter how old we are. Scientists have found
on numerous occasions that mobile phones may cause long-term memory
loss.
In 2000 Dr. Henry Lai, a research professor in bioengineering at
the University of Washington, has linked long-term memory loss and
diminished navigating skills in rats with the microwaves emitted by
mobile phones.
"This is the first study that shows that radio frequencies can
affect long-term memory functions in rats," Lai said. Previous studies
have focused mainly on short-term memory.
Lai placed 100 rats in a large tank of water and taught them to
swim to a platform in the middle of the tank. After swimming to the
platform six times, the rats were easily able to find their way to it.
Next, half of the rats were exposed to microwaves similar to those
emitted by mobile phones. All of the exposed rats forgot the way. The
unexposed rats, once again, had no problem swimming to the platform.
"Then we took the platform away," Lai said. "The normal rats went to
the location, but the irradiated rats, on the other hand, swam around
randomly, and did not approach the former location of the platform."97
• In 2006 researchers in Israel found an effect from mobile phone
base station radiation on cognitive function. They exposed 36
volunteers ot the station such that the right or the left side of the
brain was exposed. At the same time, subjects performed tests t
activate either the left or right side of the brain. They showed that
exposure to the left side of the brain slowed responses in there of the
four tasks."98
• Also in 2006 in China a research team exposed rats to a GSM
mobile phone signal for 15 minutes a day for eight days. Results showed
that exposure reduced synaptic activity and the numbers of excitory
synapses in the experioment."99
• In Greece in 2006 it was shown that phone radiation affects cognitive functions in humans."100
• Another study on cerebral blood flow was conducted where it was
observed by the researchers that 16 volunteers experienced a short-term
decrease in cerebral blood flow"101
• Recent studies from Spain, France and the UK around mobile phone
towers found that memory and concentration were affected by exposure.
Male Infertility
Male fertility has been declining for over 20 years. Whilst
oestrogenic chemicals are clearly a factor here, many studies have
indicted that EMR is also a likely variable.
A cancer specialist from West Australia, Dr John Holt, had this to
say in 1996 in private correspondence on the issue pf communications
frequencies: “Within 100 years all men and male animals will be
sterile. I believe the current level of EMR is responsible [in part]
for male infertility round the world, and this will solve the problem
of human beings and their idiocy forever.”
• An American study from the Reproductive Centre in Cleveland in
2006 shows that men who used a mobile phone had a 25 per cent lower
sperm count than men who never used a mobile. Sperm counts in the US
have plummeted 29 per cent, attributed by the study’s authors to mobile
phone emissions."103
• In 1997 Magras & Xenos placed mice at various locations in
relation
to an RF tower in Greece in order to monitor their fertility over
several generations. The ‘low’ exposure group became infertile after
five generations, and the ‘high’ exposure group after three
generations."104
• Dr George Carlo of the US showed that the cumulative DNA damage
caused by RF exposure is carried forward to future generations.
"Reduced melatonin leads to increased DNA strand breaks and
chromosome aberrations. These in turn lead to cancer and reproductive
effects." Dr Neil Cherry.
"It is clear from my reading of the scientific literature and
experiments which I have conducted that there is the strong possibility
that biological effects may be induced by long-term exposure to low
levels of microwaves and radiofrequency fields." Dr Peter French, 1997
Conclusion
Many of the health trends described here are related to each other – eg
the link between obesity, diabetes, heart disease and arthritis. This
is also reflected in research carried out by Cherry and others.
However to look only at trying to reverse such health trends is
like trying to rid the bathroom floor of water without first looking to
see where the water is coming from, and turning off the tap.
Dr. George Carlo, who used to run a multi-million dollar research
program for the mobile phone industry before going public regarding the
dangers posed by mobiles, uses the analogy of putting a frog in water.
If you put a frog in boiling water, it will jump out. However, if you
put a frog in cold water and gradually heat the water, you can cook the
frog because the frog's body will adjust to the slight changes in
temperature and it will not notice it is being cooked. Well, the same
thing might be happening to an unsuspecting public.
It has taken 50 years to finally take seriously the threat of
global warming. David Suzuki said in the 1970s that we only had 40
years left if development continued at the same pace. He was right -
but governments did not act, and now we are paying the price. It has
been same with tobacco.
Whilst not proposing that the wireless world should be switched off
tomorrow, I believe that we must heed independent scientists on the
dangers of non-thermal radiation before populations are further
damaged. There are problems in this area of research due to the
volatile and invisible nature of what is being examined - however this
is no excuse to bury our heads in the sand.
A study reported on 16th July 2007 stated that people are so
dependent upon their mobiles that they could not in any way envisage
having to live without them. This, though, is an illusion, for there
was no demand for this technology prior to its creation – except by the
companies that stood to make a profit.
"... The early studies show that oscillating signals interfere
with the brain very significantly and can change the EEG and can change
the calcium ions, and these change reaction times. This is a classical
physics approach of resonant absorption. If a system can oscillate and
an oscillating signal comes in, it can resonantly be absorbed. It is
what an aerial does, it is what a cell phone does, it is what is used
in telecommunications ... It has been demonstrated in many laboratories
that it actually does occur." Dr Neil Cherry"105
"... I have found more than 30 studies showing chromosome damage in
people exposed to radiofrequency microwave radiation. This is far more
than we have for benzine, which is a carcinogen." Dr Neil Cherry"106
Groups in the UK and Europe have suggested that lowering the exposure
limits or using more fibre optic cabling and by siting antennas away
from residential areas and schools.
It is extraordinary that in Australia telecommunications carriers
can still install antennas on rooves of shops, churches, schools and
other public buildings without permission from owners, local councils,
or those nearby, in spite of regular protests.
This technology has been rolled out the world over without any prior warning or any recourse to protest.
There were no regulations for the testing of the emissions, in spite
of the known dangers. Communities were caught by surprise, with no time
to gather information about this new pollutant.
Nevertheless in Europe and the US wireless-free zones are now being
created, along with materials and buildings as a shield against EMR.
For example, a building now exists in Budapest with the sole aim of
shielding its occupants from antennas, and in Canada Officials from the
Slocan Valley Economic development Commission are claiming that keeping
the valley mobile-free will draw in tourists and new residents"107
Though millions are now dependent on mobiles, email, Wi Fi,
Bluetooth, baby monitors, GPS and wireless internet access, we can work
to make the technology safer.
"The problems are going to increase unless a determined effort is
made to only install sites that produce extremely low mean residential
exposures - somewhat less than 0.01uW/cm2."
Dr Neil Cherry, 2001.
The human race has evolved against a background of very low level
natural radiation - about 8Hz. The current artificial radiation is now
billions of times higher than when our grandparents lived
“This pulsing is in the frequency range of our brain waves and can
cause them to speed up or slow down, changing our level of
consciousness, as has been demonstrated by electroencephalograms”
(EEG)."108
If the effects showing up now after only 15 years are anything to
go by - and if levels continue to increase as they are bound to do with
the further development of wireless technology - what sort of effects
on the human being can we expect in future years?“
Research is beginning to indicate that there may be no safe
threshold for these exposures, just like for x-rays….and if that’s the
case, we are in trouble because non-ionising radiation is everywhere
and growing exponentially.”109
In view of current data, it is not hard to envisage worldwide,
irreversible damage on all levels – including those of a more subtle
nature as indicated by the Egyptian study - if the issue is not taken
more seriously by governments.
There are also indications that RF/MW radiation may be contributing
to global warming through the atmospheric agitation of hydrogen
molecules in the upper atmosphere and ionosphere,"110 and scientists
have also found that the increase in illness due to bacterial growth is
a result of exposure to ambient radiation"111.
I have only presented the studies indicating adverse health effects
from EMR that relate to publicised health trends – leaving out many of
the problems that have been documented - either anecdotally or as
epidemiological evidence – such as Electrosensitivity, hearing loss,
ADHD, violence and epilepsy.
"More evidence has accumulated suggesting that there are adverse
health effects from occupational and public exposures to electric,
magnetic and electromagnetic fields, or EMF, at current exposure
levels. What is needed, but not yet realised, is a comprehensive,
independent and transparent examination of the evidence pointing to
this emerging, potential public health issue."
The Benevento Resolution, 2006.
Recommendation
That the Telecommunications Act is amended in accordance with the
Precautionary Principle – i.e. that antennas should not be erected in
residential areas or in the vicinity of schools and child care centres.
References
1 Becker, R., 2000: Interview with Linda Moulton Howe. Author of The Body Electric
(William Morrow & Co., 1987) and Cross Currents (Tarcher/Putnam, 1990).
2
Barnett, S., 1994, Status of Research on Biological Effects and safety
of Electromagnetic Radiation: Telecommunications Frequencies, CSIRO,
Division of Radiophysics.
3 Cherry, N., 2000: Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is
Genotoxic: The Implications for the Epidemiology of Cancer, Cardiac,
Neurological and Reproductive Effects.
4 Oberto G, et al, 2007: Carcinogenicity Study of 217 Hz Pulsed 900 MHz
Electromagnetic Fields in Pim1 Transgenic Mice. Radiat Res; 168 (3):
316 - 326
5 Marshall 2001, Weatherall 2007.
6 Lixia S., et al, 2006: Effects of 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field on DNA
damage and expression of heat shock protein 70 in human lens epithelial
cells. Volume 602, Issues 1-2, 1 135-142
7 Diem, E., et al, 2005: Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone
radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17
rat granulosa cells in vitro, 2004.
8 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, 2001: Inquiry into
Electromagnetic Radiation, Report of the Senate, Environment,
Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Committee: Ch 2
P.28, 2.61.
9 Op cit: Cherry, 2000.
10 Hallberg, O., 2007: Adverse health indicators correlating with
sparsely populated areas in Sweden; European Journal of Cancer
Prevention. 16(1):71-76.
11 Zhao, TY et al, 2007: Studying gene expression profile of rat neuron
exposed to 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields with cDNA
micro assay. Toxicology, 235 (3): 167 - 175
12 Orendacova, J., et al 2007: Neurobiological effects of microwave
exposure: a review focused on morphological findings in experimental
animals; Arch Ital Biol, 145(1):1-12.
13 http://www.energyfields.org/
14 Havas, M., 2006, Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological
Effects of Dirty Electricity with Emphasis on Diabetes and Multiple
Sclerosis. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 25: 259-268.
15 Takahashi, et al 1994: Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Human
Growth Hormone Transgenic Rats, Endocrinology Vol. 139, No. 7 3057-3063
16 Xie et al, 2004; Goldberg G, 2006; Buchachenk et al, 2006.
17 Reiter, R.J., 1994: Melatonin suppression by static and extremely
low frequency electromagnetic fields: relationship to the reported
increased incidence of cancer. Reviews on Environmental Health,
10(3-4): 171-86.
18 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2006: Cancer in Australia – an Overview.
19 ZDNet.co.uk, 2002
20 Ibid
21 EMR and Health: Vol 2 No 3, 2006.
22 Repacholi, M., 1997, Lymphomas in Eμ-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to
pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields, Radiat Res 1997; 147 (5): 631 -
640
23 EMR Inquiry: Chapter 2, p. 83, 2001, Op cit.
24 Cherry, N., 2001, Probable Health effects Associated with base Stations in Communities: The Need for Health Surveys., p. 2.
25 http://www.feb.se/Bridlewood/NEWS1999.HTM
26 Oberfeld, et al, 2004: The Microwave Syndrome: Further Aspects of a Spanish Study
27 Eger, H., et al, 2004: The influences of being physically near a
cell phone transmission mast on the incidence of cancer: Umwelt Medizin
Gesellschaft, 2004.
28 Wolf and Wolf, 2004: Increased Incidence of Cancer near a Cell Phone
Transmitter Station, International Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 1,
No 2.
29 Abdel-Rassoul, G., et al 2006: Neurobehavioral effects among
inhabitants around mobile base stations,, NeuroToxicology,
doi:10.1016/j.neuro.012.
30 Santini, R., et al, 2002: Study of the health of people living in
the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: Influences of distance and
sex, Pathol Biol 50: 369-73.
31 Times Online: April 22 2007.
32 http://www.starweave.com/gallery
33 Ha, M., et al, 2007: Radio-Frequency Radiation Exposure from AM
Radio Transmitters and Childhood Leukaemia and Brain Cancer, American
Journal of Epidemiology.
34 Michelelozzi, P., et al, 2002; American Journal of Epidemiology 155(12):1096-103.
35 Hocking, B., et al 1996: Cancer incidence and mortality and proximity to TV towers,, Medical Journal of Australia.
36 Senate Inquiry 2001, Op cit. Ch. 2, 2.44.
37 Australian Bureau of Statistics: Cancer in Australia: A Snapshot, 2004-05
38 Media Release, Australian Institute for Health and Welfare May 2006.
39 Breast Cancer Fund & Breast Cancer Action, San Francisco, 2006:
State of the Evidence, What is the connection between the environment
and breast cancer, 4th edition
40 Ibid
34
41 Blask, D., 2005, Melatonin-Depleted Blood from Premenopausal Women
Exposed to Light at Night Stimulates Growth of Human Breast Cancer
Xenografts in Nude Rats, Cancer Research 65, 11174-11184.
42 Breast Cancer Fund, Op cit 2006.
43 Ravandi-Kashani F, Hayes T.G, 1998: Male breast cancer: a review of the literature. Elsevier: Volume 34, Number 9 , pp. 1341-
23 Rachel’s Environment & Health News, 1996.
45 ibid
46 BBC News, 2001.
47 Oncolink Cancer News, 2003: Brain tumour incidence on the rise in U.S. and Europe.
48 Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscapes, 2005: Electrosmog in the Environment.
49 Lahkola et al, 2005: Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma:
results of the Interphone case-control study in five North European
countries, British Journal of Cancer, 93 (7): 842 - 848
50 Hardell, L., et al, 2007: Long-term use of cellular phones and brain
tumours - increased risk associated with use for > 10 years,
Occupational Environ Med. Published Online First:
doi:10.1136/oem.2006.029751.
51 Hardell, L., et al; 2006: Tumour risk associated with use of
cellular telephones or cordless desktop telephones. World Journal of
Surg Oncology, 11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-4-74.
52 Salford, L., et al: 2003: Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after
exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environmental Health
Perspectives, Volume 111, Number 7.
53 Salahaldin and Bener, 2006: International Tinnitus Journal, 12(2):145-8.
54 Aalto, S et al: 2006. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,
55 Rossinin, P., et al: 2006, Annals of Neurology,
56 McLean, L: 2007, EMR and Health, Vol 3 No 1.
57 Microwave News, January 2006.
58 EMR and Health, 2006 Vol 2, No 1 & 2.
59 Mild, et al, 1998, Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms.
Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital
mobile phones., Occup Med (Lond) 51(1):25-35, 2001
60 Hocking, B., 1998, Preliminary report: symptoms associated with mobile phone use, Occup Med (Lond);48(6):357-360
61 Chia et al, 2000, Prevalence of Headache among Hand-Held Cellular
Telephone Users in Singapore: A Community Study, Environmental Health
Perspectives Volume 108, Number 11.
62 Cherry, 2000, Probable Health effects Associated with base Stations in Communities: The Need for Health Surveys, p.1
63 Ibid.
64 Australian Prostate Cancer Website: http://www.prostatehealth.org.au/newsitem.html?notice_id=497.
65 Cherry, 2000, Op cit.
66 George Institute for International Health 2005: High blood pressure
the culprit in 2 out of 3 heart attacks and strokes in the
Asia-Pacific,.
67 Muntner, P., et al: Trends in Blood Pressure among Children and
Adolescents, Journal, of the American Medical Association, 2004;
291:2107-2113..
68 Russell and Robinson, 1995: Melatonin: your body’s natural wonder drug, New York Bantam Books.
69 Op cit,
70 Braune, S, et al, 1998: Resting blood pressure increase during
exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field. Lancet
351(9119):1857-1858.
71 Cherry, 2000: Op cit, p. 25.
72 Mullins, 2007: Paediatric food allergy trends in a community-based
specialist allergy practice, 1995–2006, Medical Journal of Australia.
73 Australian Institute for Health and Welfare: Selected Chronic Disease among Australia’s Children, 2005
74 French, P., et al (1997): Electromagnetic Radiation at 835 MHz
changes the morphology and inhibits proliferation of a human
astrocytoma cell line.
75 Rajkovic et al, 2003: Histological and stereological analysis of
cutaneous mast cells in rats exposed to 50 Hz EMF, 6th International
Congress of the European Bioelectromagnetics Association (EBEA),
Budapest, Hungary, November 13-15, (abstract).
76 Bergier et al 1990, Dmoch & Moszczynski 1998, Moszczynski et al 1999, Yuan et al 2004, Kimata 2005.
77 FEB - The Swedish Association for the ElectroSensitive http://www.feb.se/ARTICLES/TheGoldenGoose.html
78 BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6249174.stm
79 WebMD: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/26/health/webmd/main2984847.shtml
80 Modak et al 1981, Dutta et al 1992, Omura & Losco 1993, Testylier et al 2002, Gautier et al 2003
81 Persson, B.R.R., Salford, L.G. and Brun, A., 1997: Blood-brain
barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in
wireless communication. Wireless Network 3: 455-461.
82 Ibid
83 Salford, L., Op cit, 2003.
84 Senate Inquiry, Op cit 2000, Ch 2, 2.60.
85 Doyon, P., 2004: Do You Have Microwave/EMR Sickness? http://www.cassmd.com/microwave.html
86 Mausset-Bonnefont et al 2004, Sieron et al 2004 35
87 Brown & Gershon 1993 .
88 Cherry 2000, Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is Genotoxic:
The implications for the epidemiology of cancer and cardiac,
neurological and reproductive effects, p. 32.
89 EMR and Health, 2006: E-Smog and Depression, Vol 2 No 1.
90 Op cit, Murcia, 2004.
91 Swiss Agency report, Op cit.
92 Hutter, et al; 2000: Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and
cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base
stations.
93 Senate Inquiry, Op cit, 2001, Ch.2, 2.87.
94 mX newspaper, 2007.
96 Cherry, N., 2000, EMR Reduces Melatonin in Animals and People
97 Wang, B.M. and Lai, H., 2000: Acute exposure to pulsed 2450-MHz
microwaves affects water maze learning in the rat. Bioelectromagnetics
21:52-56.
98 Eliyahu, I. et al, 2006: Bioelectromagnetics, 27(2): 119-126.
99 Xu, S et al,: Neurosci Lett Jan 25, 2006.
100 Papageorgiou, G., et al 2006: Neurosci Lett, Jan 4.
101 Wolf, M., et al, 2006: Do GSM 900MHz signals affect cerebral blood
circulation? A near-infrared spectrophotometry study, Optics Express,
Vol. 14, Issue 13, pp. 6128-6141
102 Cherry, N., 2000, Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is
Genotoxic: The implications for the epidemiology of cancer and cardiac,
neurological and reproductive effects, p. 33.
103 Agarwal, et al 1997: Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis
in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study, 2006.
104 Magras and Xenos, 1997: RF radiation induced changes in the pre-natal development of mice. Bioelectromagnetics, 18(6): 455-
106 Koyama, S et al, 2007; Mobile Phone Radiation affects bacterial and gene mutations. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 48(1):69-75.
107 Blake L., and Morrow, T., 2007: Electrosmog – What Price Convenience? http://www.energyfields.org/pdfs/ElectroSmog.pdf.
|